Sadly, it’s all true, and we’ve reached this level: Components 1 is getting ready for a radical change beginning in 2026, with the introduction of recent laws aimed toward enhancing the spectacle on the monitor via the implementation of an “override” system. Basically, a BoP. The purpose is to create a efficiency balancing system (Stability of Efficiency or BoP) to create a synthetic efficiency hole between the vehicles, thus facilitating overtaking and maintaining competitors alive.
It goes with out saying, nonetheless, that this determination has already sparked differing opinions amongst business consultants and followers. The purpose is to align Components 1 with new sustainability and leisure wants, however the value to pay is clearly a contest distorted in its essence.
The center of the change will probably be a single ECU managed by the FIA, which is able to management the ability and gas consumption of each the thermal and electrical engines of every automobile. The ECU will set a most energy restrict: 400 kW for the thermal engine and 350 kW for the electrical one. By the override command, the system will have the ability to quickly cut back the ability of the main car, permitting the chasing driver to keep up excessive energy ranges for prolonged durations, thus creating pace variations particularly designed for overtakes.
The adoption of the BoP in Components 1, disguised as a software to favor overtakes, represents a historic change, doubtlessly second solely to the entire electrification that additionally threatened to reach within the highest class of world motorsport (and whose threat isn’t but totally dominated out). This method, in reality, establishes a normal efficiency restrict, flattening the variations between groups and steering the competitors towards an more and more managed and uniform administration of the vehicles. In case you choose, you possibly can simply label it as a real manipulation of technical values.
This maneuver can even cut back engineering creativity and the distinctiveness (already very restricted) of the vehicles, limiting the house for technical innovation in favor of a Components 1 pushed by electronics and computing.
Allow us to do not forget that, as established in earlier months, from 2026, there will probably be an actual revolution (already decided) concerning the ability models. The brand new laws, additionally specializing in sustainability, will introduce substantial adjustments in vitality administration and gas utilization. The electrical engine energy will enhance to 350 kW, with a battery regeneration capability rising from 2 to 9 MJ per lap.
On the similar time, the thermal engine will bear an influence discount, dropping from 550 kW to 400 kW, whereas gas consumption will probably be restricted by even stricter laws. Moreover, the turbocharging system will probably be decreased, with a turbo stress restrict set at 4.8 bar.
The brand new energy models can even need to adapt to energetic aerodynamics (the third main novelty of the 2026 laws), which is able to enable real-time changes to the automobile’s aerodynamic setup to optimize traction and vitality effectivity, however this can even be managed via centralized software program that can restrict the design freedom of the groups.
The conclusions and feedback on these selections may appear superfluous. For individuals who love motorsport, all of that is bordering on miserable. The times when on-track battles had been genuine and the values of the drivers could possibly be matched with the technical designs of the vehicles in a clear and interesting battle on the monitor are nearly extinct. Actually, all this additionally is available in response to the necessity to cut back environmental influence, an more and more central theme in motorsport. Nevertheless, it’s legit to ask whether or not manipulating the values on the monitor is really vital for the said sustainability purpose, or whether or not it’s extra of a advertising and marketing technique to keep up public curiosity.
Components 1 (which now solely carries the identify of the game we keep in mind) is more and more changing into a problem of software program and digital administration. And maybe this step (which comes after the architectural restrictions of engines in 1995, the ban on in-season testing in 2009, the introduction of DRS in 2012, and the arrival of energy models in 2014) marks the definitive farewell to the game we as soon as knew.