- Insurance coverage claims counsel EVs are in various kinds of lower-speed crashes
- EVs usually tend to be rear-ended, much less prone to have front-end injury
- Combustion autos and EVs are full-loss totaled at about the identical price
EVs are extra usually concerned in numerous sorts of collisions than internal-combustion vehicles, knowledge from Mitchell Worldwide present, with one-pedal driving methods doubtlessly contributing to this.
Mitchell, which gives tech for the auto insurance coverage and collision restore industries, has beforehand reported that EV collision restore prices are greater than these for gasoline autos. Now the corporate is delving into the varieties of fender-benders EVs are usually concerned in versus internal-combustion vehicles.
In a press launch printed Wednesday, the corporate stated its knowledge reveals that EVs usually tend to maintain rear-end injury than internal-combustion autos, with these collisions accounting for 35.9% of EV collisions and 27.5% of internal-combustion automobile collisions, respectively. Combustion vehicles have a better frequency of front-end collisions, at 31.5%, in comparison with 25.8% for EVs.
2025 Kia Niro EV
Mitchell believes that is possible down to 2 most important components. One is that EVs are usually newer, which means they’re extra prone to have the most recent front-collision avoidance tech. The corporate additionally cited the “totally different braking dynamics” of EVs in one-pedal mode, which might trigger extra speedy deceleration that drivers in following vehicles aren’t ready for.
Whereas collisions involving a front-end affect are 40% costlier on common than these involving a rear-end affect, EVs nonetheless stay costlier to restore general, in keeping with Mitchell. The corporate’s knowledge reveals that in Q3, insurance coverage claims for repairable autos within the U.S. averaged $5,560 for EVs, $5,229 for plug-in hybrids, $4,426 for gentle hybrids, and $4,741 for non-hybrid combustion autos.
That continues a development from Q2, when Mitchell discovered that EV collision-repair prices have been 20% greater than these for different autos. Excessive restore prices have been additionally among the many causes cited by Hertz for slowing its EV plans.
2025 BMW i4
The most recent report from Mitchell did present a touch about why this can be the case. Whereas about the identical share of elements are repaired, BEV vs ICE, BEV repairs require 90% original-equipment producer (OEM) elements, whereas ICE fashions require 64% OEM elements. The remaining come from the aftermarket, possible at a decrease value than OEM elements.
EVs and combustion autos are written off as a complete loss at about the identical price—9.9% of all claims. The common market worth of EVs declared a complete loss is $32,718, pretty near the $31,070 common for 2021-or-newer combustion autos, which Mitchell judged to be most much like EVs in complexity and value to restore.
Excessive EV restore prices are well-documented, however we’re now additionally seeing hints that the totally different driving dynamics of EVs could play a task within the frequency of collisions. Along with Mitchell’s citing of one-pedal driving as a think about rear-end collisions, a report printed final month discovered that EV drivers are extra prone to be at fault in crashes, and famous that drivers’ habits modified when switching to an EV.
